The Silk Industry of Bengal: A Review of Commercial Tradition, Culture, and Imperialism/ বাংলার রেশম শিল্প : বাণিজ্যিক ঐতিহ্য, সংস্কৃতি ও সাম্রাজ্যবাদের একটি পর্যালোচনা

Authors

  • Pallabi Chatterjee সহকারী অধ্যাপিকা, ইতিহাস বিভাগ গভর্মেন্ট জেনারেল ডিগ্রি কলেজ তেহট্ট Author

Keywords:

  • Bengal silk industry,
  • Murshidabad,
  • Kasimbazar port,
  • East India Company,
  • Industrial Revolution,
  • impact of famine 1770,
  • colonial economy,
  • Sericulture department

Abstract

The silk industry is one of the oldest and most significant cottage industries of India, with Bengal historically serving as a major hub of production and trade. References to silk fabrics in ancient Indian literature, including the Vedas, epics, and religious texts, attest to its antiquity and cultural value. In Bengal, the term “silk” is derived from ab-resham. The industry flourished along both banks of the Bhagirathi River, particularly in Murshidabad, Kasimbazar, Saidabad, Jangipur, and Rajshahi, from where raw silk was exported to markets across Europe and Asia.

           The arrival of the Portuguese in the sixteenth century, followed by the Dutch, English, French, Armenians, and other European merchants, transformed Bengal’s silk industry into a center of international commerce. Although the Dutch initially dominated, the English eventually took control, aided by local gumastas who participated in the trade. Murshidabad’s rise as the capital of Bengal during the Nawabi period further enhanced the economic importance of the region.

           However, the Battle of Plassey (1757) and subsequent colonial policies brought devastating consequences. The East India Company’s duty-free trade privileges, along with the agency and contract system, disrupted traditional structures. The catastrophic famine of 1769–70, which decimated mulberry cultivators and weavers, inflicted irreparable damage. Coupled with declining European demand during the Industrial Revolution, the industry witnessed a steep decline.

            In the nineteenth century, firms like Watson & Co., James Lyall & Co., and Louis Pajen & Co. attempted to revive trade, but foreign competition, silkworm disease, and administrative inefficiencies hindered progress. Reformers such as Nityagopal Mukherjee promoted sericulture through pasteurization techniques, leading to the formation of the Bengal Silk Association in 1898. The early twentieth century saw renewed visibility through S. S. Bagchi & Co.’s participation in international exhibitions, but most European companies ultimately withdrew. The Textile Protection Act of 1934 and the establishment of a central silk research center at Berhampore were state-led interventions to safeguard the industry, but the disruption caused by the partition of Bengal ultimately marginalized its significance. Today, Bengal’s once-thriving silk industry survives mainly in historical memory and material remnants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

. K. M. Mohsin, A Bengal District in Transition: Murshidabad 1765–1793 (Dacca: The Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, 1973), p. 7

. K. M. Mohsin, A Bengal District in Transition: Murshidabad 1765–1793 (Dacca: The Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, 1973), p. 47-48

. L. S. S. O’Malley, Bengal District Gazetteers: Murshidabad (Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, 1914), p. 126

. L. S. S. O’Malley, Bengal District Gazetteers: Murshidabad (Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, 1914), p. 126

. Abdul Karim, Murshid Quli Khan and His Times, Asiatic Society of Pakistan, Bangladesh, 1963, P.200

. Somendra Chandra Nandy, Life and Times of Cantoo Baboo, the Banian of Warren Hastings, 1742–1804, Vol. 1 (Calcutta: Allied Publishers, 1978), p. 393–395

. W. W. Hunter, A Statistical Account of Bengal, vol. 9 (London: Trübner & Co., 1876), p. 148

. K. M. Mohsin, A Bengal District in Transition: Murshidabad 1765–1793 (Dacca: The Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, 1973), p. 4

. W. W. Hunter, A Statistical Account of Bengal, vol. 9 (London: Trübner & Co. p. 149

. Census 1951, West Bengal District Hand Books: Murshidabad, edited by A. Mitra (Calcutta: Govt. of West Bengal, 1951), p. XXVIII

. Charles Stewart. The History of Bengal. (London: Black, Parry and Co., 1813), p. 358

. Sinha, Surendra Nath. Mir Qasim. Calcutta: Firma K. L. Mukhopadhyay, 1962, P. 172

. W. W. Hunter, A Statistical Account of Bengal, vol. 9 (London: Trübner & Co., 1876), P. 82

. K. M. Mohsin, A Bengal District in Transition: Murshidabad 1765–1793 (Dacca: The Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, 1973), PP. 72-73

. L. S. S. O’Malley, Bengal District Gazetteers: Murshidabad (Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, 1914), P. 127

. Ibid., P. 134

. Ibid, P. 129

Downloads

Published

2025-11-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Silk Industry of Bengal: A Review of Commercial Tradition, Culture, and Imperialism/ বাংলার রেশম শিল্প : বাণিজ্যিক ঐতিহ্য, সংস্কৃতি ও সাম্রাজ্যবাদের একটি পর্যালোচনা. (2025). TRISANGAM INTERNATIONAL REFEREED JOURNAL, 5(4), 619-625. https://tirj.org.in/tirj/article/view/426