প্রাচীন ভারতের পরিবেশবিজ্ঞান : বৃহৎসংহিতায় ভূগর্ভস্থ জলের সূচক/ Ancient Indian Environmental Science: A Study of Groundwater Indicators in Varāhamihira’s Bṛhatsaṁhitā
Keywords:
- বরাহমিহির,
- বৃহৎসংহিতা,
- ভূগর্ভস্থ জল,
- পরিবেশবিজ্ঞান,
- উদ্ভিদ সূচক,
- ইকো–হাইড্রোলজি,
- অনুজলবায়ু,
- ভূতাত্ত্বিক পরিবেশ
Abstract
Varāhamihira’s Bṛhatsaṁhitā, composed in the sixth century CE, represents a remarkable synthesis of empirical observation and environmental reasoning. While Varāhamihira is conventionally recognized for his contributions to astronomy and mathematics, the Udakārgala section of the fifty-fourth chapter reveals a sophisticated understanding of groundwater systems through ecological and biological indicators. This study examines Varāhamihira’s method of identifying subsurface water using plant morphology, physiology, soil characteristics, and micro-environmental variations, and situates it within the framework of modern environmental science and hydrogeology.
The Bṛhatsaṁhitā systematically associates the presence, depth, flow direction, and quality of groundwater with specific vegetational patterns—such as tree species combinations, branching structures, leaf texture and coloration, flowering anomalies, canopy density, grassland transitions, and the presence of creepers, anthills, and fauna. These indicators are not episodic but represent long-term ecological responses to sustained subsurface moisture. Varāhamihira implicitly recognized that groundwater-bearing strata generate localized microclimatic zones, influencing soil moisture, atmospheric humidity, and plant vitality even in otherwise arid landscapes.
From the perspective of modern environmental science, these observations correspond closely with contemporary concepts such as plant bioindicators, eco-hydrology, vegetation–soil–water interaction, groundwater-dependent ecosystems (GDEs), and phenological responses to subsurface hydrological conditions. Modern hydrogeology similarly acknowledges that variations in plant structure, chlorosis, canopy formation, root behavior, and species distribution can reflect groundwater depth, salinity, and aquifer dynamics. The text’s emphasis on grassland-to-non-grassland transformations aligns with current understandings of capillary water movement, soil aeration stress, and fluctuations in the vadose and phreatic zones.
This comparative analysis demonstrates that Varāhamihira’s groundwater detection methodology was empirically grounded rather than symbolic or ritualistic. His approach constitutes a proto-scientific hydrological model based on sustained environmental observation rather than mechanical instrumentation. Reassessing these ancient indicators through modern scientific frameworks not only validates their ecological relevance but also enhances contemporary approaches to sustainable groundwater exploration, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions.
Ultimately, this study positions the Bṛhatsaṁhitā as an early interdisciplinary environmental text, bridging classical knowledge systems and modern environmental science. It invites further research into historical eco-hydrological models and underscores the relevance of traditional ecological knowledge in addressing present-day water resource challenges.
Downloads
References
১. Krishna Rao, G. “Ground Water Development on Scientific Lines.” Groundwater News, vol. IV, nos. 11–12, 1985, p. 21
২. Meinzer, O. E. Plants as Indicators of Ground Water. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Supply Paper 577, 1927
৩. Meinzer, O. E., editor. Hydrology. Dover Publications, 1942
৪. তর্করত্ন পঞ্চানন, সম্পাদক, বৃহৎসংহিতা. সংস্কৃত পুস্তক ভাণ্ডার, ১৩০৩ বঙ্গাব্দ, পৃ. ১৫৪
৫. Murthy, K. S. “Indian Plants as Indicators of Mineral Deposits (Abstract).” Proceedings of the 11th International Geochemical Exploration Symposium, Toronto, Canada, 1985, p. 78
৬. Murthy, K. S. “Indian Plants as Indicators of Mineral Deposits (Abstract).” Proceedings of the 11th International Geochemical Exploration Symposium, Toronto, Canada, 1985, p. 80
৭. Prasad, E. A. V. “Varahamihira: A Great Ancient Ecologist.” Geobios, vol. 5, 1978, pp. 155–169
৮. Murthy, K. S. “Indian Plants as Indicators of Mineral Deposits (Abstract).” Proceedings of the 11th International Geochemical Exploration Symposium, Toronto, Canada, 1985, p. 79
৯. Murthy, K. S. “Indian Plants as Indicators of Mineral Deposits (Abstract).” Proceedings of the 11th International Geochemical Exploration Symposium, Toronto, Canada, 1985, p. 85
১০. তর্করত্ন পঞ্চানন, সম্পাদক, বৃহৎসংহিতা, সংস্কৃত পুস্তক ভাণ্ডার, ১৩০৩ বঙ্গাব্দ, পৃ. ১৫৫
১১. বরাহমিহির। বৃহৎসংহিতা, অধ্যায় ৫৪, শ্লোক ১৭
১২. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/১৮
১৩. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৭২
১৪.—, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৭৩
১৫. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৭৪
১৬. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৭৬
১৭. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৮৩
১৮. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৯৬
১৯. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৪৯
২০. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৫২
২১. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৫৩
২২. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৫৫
২৩. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৫৩
২৪. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৫৭
২৫. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৫৮
২৬. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৫৯
২৭. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৬১
২৮. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৬২
২৯. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৮৫
৩০. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৯২
৩১. —, বৃহৎসংহিতা, ৫৪/৯৩
৩২. Prasad, E. A. V. Ground Water in Varahamihira’s Brihat Samhita. Sri Venkateswara University, 1980. p-351
৩৩. Prasad, E. A. V. ‘Bioindicators for Nonbiotic Natural Resources in Varahamihira’s ‘Brihat Samhita’. Symposium on Biomonitoring of the State of Environment, Indian National Science Academy, New Delhi, 1985, pp. 205–206
৩৪. Prasad, E. A. V. ‘Geobotanical Exploration in Varahamihira’s ‘Brihat Samhita’. Groundwater News, vol. 3, 1984, p. 4
৩৫. Prasad, E. A. V. ‘Geobotanical Exploration in Varahamihira’s ‘Brihat Samhita’. Groundwater News, vol. 3, 1984, pp. 7–8
৩৬. Shacklette, H. T. ‘Some Remarks at the Opening of the Symposium’. International Seminar on Geobotany and Biogeochemistry in Exploration for Ground Water and Mineral Resources, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, Abstract Volume, 1984, pp. 1–3

